User blog comment:Tamagod12345/new category that talks about evil characters/@comment-36678579-20200327193431

I think a lot of characters are up to interpretation, such as the Groke listed here, so may need some alterations on this category idea as labelling characters as such could cause discourse. Categorising characters as something more detailed than merely Minor and Main Characters is something that really needs to be a group effort or discussion instead of one person categorising this way based on their sole personal opinion.

Do we really need to separate characters in terms of their alliances/alignments? If characters can't be defined clearly into "enemies" or "antagonists" then it might be a bit of a redundant categorisation :/ Even Stinky, for example, though an antagonistic character, is seen as a friend of the family sometimes. It seems to me this category would just end up being based on personal interpretations rather than source information, which goes against our goal to be impartial and encyclopaedic.

I disagree with the term "malicious" as, in the case of the Groke and the Hattifatteners for example, they don't seem to realise if they come across as scary. The moral Tove teaches is not to judge on appearances or first impressions, so labelling them as "malicious" or "evil" feels like it is going against what was intended.